The controversial article "Are NewJeans' Parents Bullying Journalists? Attempt to Silence the Media?" by TenAsia on February 15 delves into the fundamental role of journalism in investigating and reporting on matters of public concern. The piece questions the ethics of publicly naming journalists, branding it as a coercive tactic.

In response to an article on February 14 linking NJZ, the parents of NewJeans, to a potential departure from ADOR, NJZ vehemently refuted the claims, labeling them as baseless. However, industry insiders hinted at collaboration between BANA and NewJeans members, sparking speculation about the group's affiliations.

While the media watchdog highlighted the legitimacy of probing the agency ties of NewJeans, NJZ threatened legal action against the journalist, accusing them of spreading falsehoods. The editor stressed that impartial reporting on industry dynamics is vital, cautioning against online defamation.

The narrative shifts to the debate within TenAsia about balancing press freedom with fact-checking protocols to uphold accuracy. The impending legal battle between TenAsia and NJZ is closely watched, with its outcome expected to impact the future trajectory of TenAsia.

Stay tuned for updates on NJZ's forceful denial of collaboration rumors with Beasts And Natives Alike.