The rejection of the injunction regarding the exclusive contract of the members of NJZ (New Jin's) and a legal expert criticizing the court's decision was highlighted.

Lawyer Jang Seo-yeon of the Public Interest Human Rights Foundation emphasized that in the K-pop idol exclusive contracts, establishing a high level of trust is crucial. She emphasized the importance that idols should have the freedom to decide who they want to work with before being considered as members of a specific group.

Jang commented that idols, before being grouped together, are individuals who should have the autonomy to choose with whom they want to engage in artistic activities. She stressed that if the entertainment company infringes on these fundamental rights, the idols should have the right to terminate the contract.

She highlighted the structural issue of K-pop idols being engaged in prolonged labor, including demanding tours, events, frequent injuries, and mental health deterioration. The lawyer pointed out that the issue is not just about providing services but about contracting the entire lifelong journey as an idol for seven years.

Jang also mentioned the significant change in personnel within the management team of NJZ, raising concerns about the breach of trust due to substantial alterations in the contractual terms without the consent of the members.

Moreover, she criticized the court for failing to consider the replacement of key personnel who were trusted by the members. She argued that this oversight undermines the legal fairness of the decision as it disregards the impact of changing personnel on the trust relationship.

She further assessed that forcing idols to engage in exclusive activities under an unsafe company violates their dignity and restricts their freedom to work.

Jang's critiques outlined the importance of upholding the rights and autonomy of idols in the K-pop industry, advocating for a fair and respectful working environment for artists.